Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Filmsi - A not so serious look at films and film reviews

 
Anything film =D

A Good Day to Die Hard, 2013

I have to admit that I am not a die-hard Die Hard fan but I did enjoy the first movie, it had this battler charm that was carried to the other films. Well at least this charm was carried to first few. The charm of the exciting and cleverly constructed action film that we saw in Die Hard was definitely not present in 5th installment to the franchise. It's a dying and frail old man, and I wish someone would finally put it to rest. It needs not to be awaken again. But I'm sure my heartfelt plea will fall on deaf ears and before you know it Die Hard 6 would be screening in a theatre near you.


At this point I would usually summarise the plot of the film but it feel like such a waste of words to do so. Nevertheless it would be unfair to, you, the reader. It is difficult to try to explain the chaos that I saw into somewhat coherent summary but I will do my best. For those you have seen the trailer, you have pretty much seen most of the movie. Our hero once again finds himself in trouble but this time in Moscow, Russia. Oh, how exotic of Hollywood to venture to Eastern Europe. This time, Mr John McClane (Bruce Willis) is to save his son Jack (Jai Courtney) from a life of crime. Director, John Moore tapping into "feeling guilty for not being there for my delinquent child" story. But I'm not convinced and I didn't watch the film to witness the acting brilliance that is Bruce Willis. Nevertheless an attempt of being somewhat convincing would have been a nice change. In reality McClane Jr. is in fact US federal agent in Russia. What is an American agent doing in Russia meddling in Russian domestic politics? I don't know but I believe it might have been discussed in the film but it most likely gotten lost between car chases and jumping off buildings. The film has a very thin plot that is placed around the action, it does not complement it nor does it provide any relevance to the film. It is simply watching one and half hours of explosions and impossibilities.


The Die Hard franchise is not known for its realism. However there is stretching reality and there is downright ridiculousness. And Die Hard 5 was just plain ridiculous. As the audience, are we to believe that John is in a car that is flipped over four times and comes out virtually unscathed?! Or the fact he jumps off a 4 storey building into a pool and not even one dislocated shoulder? The acting was on the terrible side too. I feel that even Willis is completely bored with this franchise. What happened to the bald angry man that we "loved"? McClane is practically emotional disconnected with the movie. Like he doesn't even care whether or not this works out.

McClane Jr. was equally unimpressive, his character is so boring and 2 dimensional. There was little incentive for the audience to care about McClane Jr. or the forced father-son relationship drama.

The plot twists were predictable and thus defeats the purpose of being a twist. Furthermore the movie is unengaging and downright boring. I was so bored that I went to the bathroom even though I really didn't need to. I know I'm over sharing here but seriously this is how bored I was with this movie. It really couldn't more boring (well it probably could).

It was so unimpressive even the action scenes felt forced and painful to watch. In the modern day action film it is not enough to simply blow things up, the action is often stylised and carefully constructed. And thus Die Hard 5 simplistic action scenes could not compete the innovative ways to entertain audiences.

Final Verdict: This was disappointing effort from the creators, a lazy film for everyone involved. Lifeless, passionless chaos pretending to be a film. Give it a miss. 4/10.
Add CommentsAdd Comments
19
Vote
   


A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints, 2006

Young Dito
A guide to recognizing your saints is a little known independent piece from the writer and director Dito Montiel. A guide to recognizing your saints is the film adaption to the Montiel's autobiography of the same name. The film follows Dito as an adult played by Robert Downey Jr. however the film is mostly in a long flashback to Dito's younger days in New York. The film explores the harsh realities of a young Ditto (Shia LaBeouf) living in working class Queens.

A guide to recognizing your saints is not a perfect film however it was still amazing and incredibly real. Films about the ghettos of the 80's have been around before but this one does have heart. There might be a few questions about the stereotypes that were used by Montiel in the film and possibly in the book however it still felt real. I have to say credit has to go the amazing cast that was in this film. The young actors in the film held their own in a film that is difficult and emotionally driven. Although their performances are not perfect however it was impressive for young actors at the time. I was particularly impressed by Channing Tatum who plays the abused delinquent and best friend of Dito, young Antonio.

Playing the tough guy for Tatum is probably not a difficult given that he oozes in the tough guy demeanour. However it really was he ability to bring the emotional aspect of Antonio that made me notice that Tatum in fact can be a talented actor. Of course I had seen him in other films, usually b-grade romantic comedies but to see him in a serious role was a pleasant change.
LaBeouf as the young Dito was impressive however less so than Tatum, although LaBeouf is as usual has likeable personality which carries him in most of his films. Maybe LaBeouf lacked some of the maturity his older co-star had or whatever it may be I felt that he just didn't deliver the emotional sensitive that was needed in a few scenes.
It's a hard life, young Antonio

The older cast including Dianne Weist and Downey Jr. are per usual fantastic. Weist who plays Dito's mother is amazing, Weist is able to demonstrate a distressed but strong woman in with such ease. And he character in many ways doesn't belong in such a rough and unforgiving environment.

A guide to recognising your saints is ultimately depressing but this does not make it disappointing. The film allude to the fact that many people who grow up in Queens stay in Queens and never truly leave the poverty and bleakness of their situation. This is the ultimate reality of the film. Older Dito walking around in the streets realising the not much has changed since he left all those years ago. For those live in lower class and impoverished areas such as the world that is depicted in the film there is an overwhelming sense of hopelessness and Montiel has captured this well in the film. This partly captured by the flash forward to present day older Dito realising his friends have remained stuck in much of their old ways. Arguably for some this might it's detriment, being so uncomfortably dark. The film shows the difficulties and realities for some people and it may not make the audience feel good after the film however this is not its purpose.

The end feels a little neat and brings the film to a full circle and though this would seem like the predictable end to such a dark film, to possibly stop people from going home feeling like the need to watch a romantic comedy to recover. Thus I do believe that Montiel may have taken some creative liberties when ending the film and what I presume the ending of the book as well. However I cannot be sure of course.

I usually do not like slow paced films however the film was well paced, it had the dramatic pause when needed however never over using it. I particularly enjoyed the creativity in which he tells his story, sometimes there is a slight delay in audio as you see the pictures flash before, giving the audience this sensation of a distant memory. Although I didn't like the constant close-ups with the actors in the film and the shaky camera annoyed me. I understand the camera was suppose to feel as if you are with Dito and his mates but it's a personal peeve of mine if the camera is not steady.

Final Verdict: A guide to recognizing your saints is a dark film however does end on a much more uplifting note which may please the wider audience however felt forced for me. I thoroughly enjoyed the dark and gritty realism that Montiel had infused in the film. Despite my dislike for shaky camera work, Montiel had used interesting film techniques that adds to the nostalgic feel to the film. I was impressed by the cast particularly the young actors who showed maturity in a emotional difficult film. 7.9/10.
Brilliant in their elements Wiest and Downey Jr.
Add CommentsAdd Comments
28
Vote
   


Oh hey!

Oh Hey

There you are.... long time no see. Don't worry I am coming back and it's going to be exciting because I am reviewing a really awesome movie next time I post!!

Do you wanna know what it is?

Guess what? You have to wait and see!


Much Love,
Samira

P.S. And Happy Valentine's Day!
Add CommentsAdd Comments
29
Vote
   


I love you, man 2009

It’s telling of the times when romantic comedies are now based on purely platonic relationship between two men. Just like JD and Turk from the hit TV show Scrubs has repeatedly attempted to convince others, “its guy love between two guys. And there is nothing gay about it.” The bromance; the shared bond between two guys may be the strongest bond two people can have is the central theme for I love you, man.

I personally love this idea of male bonding relished and celebrated. And although male bonding have been central to many movies but exploring a relationship between two guys that is deep and profound that goes beyond just hanging out, playing poker and drinking is often rare, if it’s ever been attempted before that is.

I love you, man begins with Peter (Paul Rudd), a young man who just proposed to his girlfriend and is about to start his life with the women he loves. But the only problem is that well Peter is not what you call, “one of the guys”. As his family has explained, Peter is more of a girlfriend –guy. He puts all of his efforts into relationships rather than his male friendships. Peter concerned with the fact he has no male friends he journeys to find the perfect male companion and best man for his upcoming wedding. Peter instils the help from his younger gay brother Robbie (Andy Samburg) and Robbie sets Peter with numerous dates or “man-dates” in hopes that Peter can find the one. Without prevail as Peter is about to give up when he meets Sydney (Jason Segal) at an open house free loading on the sandwiches and hitting on divorcees. And that’s when the magic happens really.
First "man-date

I love you, man does strangely follow the formula of a romantic comedy pretty closely. You know the awkward phone calls and waiting for the other person to respond and the nerves of going on a “man-date” with someone you really like. Then followed by the development of the relationship and some conflict and the eventual resolution, despite the predictable nature of the film it’s entertaining and genuinely funny. The film is no comedy classic but still brings the laughs in the appropriate times. And although I was not in hysterics for most of the film there were a few moments that were truly funny.

The film is good because it is original and reflective of the times. As mentioned above the fact it explores a friendship between two guys but not always from a typical playing poker male bonding. The film is relatable, even for me, a female in her early 20’s. That credit goes to the lead performances by Segal and Rudd. As the hero the film Rudd is likable but let’s be honest Rudd is just a likable guy. He is sweet, reliable and generally the go-to guy, no one can hate Rudd. Segal usually plays the role of the weird bachelor and does so again in this film and although I don’t believe this is his strongest performance but then again he doesn’t take away from the Rudd but nicely complements him. In many ways this is a credit to him being able to play the friend and not the lead role and not steal the show from Rudd. And let’s be honest Segal does have enough to likability to do it.
Love at first ride

Supporting cast was amazing in the film and the group of actors just naturally work so well together. I know they’re acting but if feels a lot like friends being friends rather than work. This worked really well for the film and made the jokes follow and hit the marks easily and proficiently. Honourable mentions are, of course, Rashida Jones as Zooey, Peter’s girlfriend and Samburg as Peter’s brother.
Brotherly love

Zooey could have easily gone to the crazy girlfriend but John Hamburg and Ivan Reitman (directors and writers) have avoided this and she comes off nicely in the film and again works perfectly with Rudd. I really loved the character of Robbie, even though personally I have never been a huge fan of Samburg but Robbie was such an awesome character it was hard not to love him. Despite being the gay brother, Robbie was probably the straightest character of the bunch. And I personally loved that portrayed a gay man that wasn’t overtly gay or acting like Kurt form Glee.
The beautiful bride

Final verdict: I love you, man is a modern comedy about a bromance between two guys. The cast work well together and although the film is formulaic however due to the novelty of the concept I’m not bothered. The film did not have me in hysterics but the likeability of characters carry the film making it a solid romantic comedy. 7/10
Add CommentsAdd Comments
20
Vote
   


New post

I promise there will be a new post soonish,

Love you all

Samira =D
Add CommentsAdd Comments
19
Vote
   


Celeste and Jesse Forever trailer


Hi everyone so this movie, Celeste and Jesse Forever which I read about in one of the movie magazines and it looks really good. And then I went on YouTube and it looked up the trailer and looks really good. The movie should be released later this year.

[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Add CommentsAdd Comments
28
Vote
   


Ruby Sparks, 2012


I have to admit that I do love a good "quirky" romantic comedy. And when I was wasting copious amounts of time on YouTube and found the trailer for Ruby Sparks, I was keen to watch it. I think I fell in love with this genre right after 500 Days of Summer. And although Ruby Sparks does not reach the standard that 500 Days of Summer set, it was a good enough effort for me to be pleased.

[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Add CommentsAdd Comments
31
Vote
   


Antenna Documentary Film Festival 2012

Hi all I have not updated my blog in a while so I wanted to update on the Antenna Documentary Film Festival happening in Sydney.

Again I hope to catch a few film this year. The festival runs from 10-14 of October in Sydney


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Add CommentsAdd Comments
32
Vote
   


The Dark Knight Rises, 2012

Read MoreRead More Comments (2)Comments (2) Add CommentsAdd Comments
31
Vote
   


Notes on a Scandal, 2006

This week’s film has the formula for being an amazing film with a very talented cast; Judi Dench, Cate Blanchett and Bill Nighy, written by Patrick Marber (screenwriter for Closer) and directed by Richard Eyre and yet Notes on a Scandal was an incredibly disappointing film.

The plot is intriguing, a young school teacher Sheba Hart (Blanchett) has an illicit affair with a 15 year old student (Andrew Simpson) and when a fellow teacher and friend Barbara (Dench) finds out Barbara promises to keep her secret. But of course it’s not all what it seems Barbara is a little too attached and a little too obsessive and downright malicious, does Sheba really know what she has gotten herself into


[ Click here to read more ]
Read MoreRead More Add CommentsAdd Comments
40
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
168 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Samira's Blogs

1317 Vote(s)
4 Comment(s)
22 Post(s)
Moderated by Samira
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]