Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Filmsi - A not so serious look at films and film reviews

 
Anything film =D

Filmsi - May 2009

Film review: The Wrestler

I admit it, I normally don't tear up from a movie. It's just not my style, and I watch them in a much different way than most humans.

But to take the old saying "There's a first time for everything", I actually got a little tear out of this one, and it stayed all movie.

Never have I've seen a character with more layers than Randy "The Ram" Robinson. A man with so many admirers and people that love him, yet never has a man been more alone. A man who is tougher than most mortal men, yet never has a man been weaker. A man anyone could have a beer with anyone, yet a man who doesn't even know his own daughter. So many strengths, so many flaws, and Darren Aronofsky does a supreme job exposing all those layers.


Randy(real name Robin Ramzinski), is on the down end of a legendary wrestling career. He is accustomed to 60,000 person crowds, and all the accolades of a star. Now, he is broke, addicted to drugs, and living between his beat up van, and an even more beat up trailer that he can barely pay rent for day after day. His life seesaws between low paying independent shows that use his fading star to add to a miniscule crowd, and a job with a grocery store where his boss treats him like low rent trash. His home is the locker room, where younger wrestlers looking for the name Randy once had, treat him like a demigod. They feel like they are in the presence of royalty, and they never even consider that he's in the same crummy locker room(or kindergarten classroom, or closet, depending on the night) as they are. Such is the life of indy wrestling(this truly does have a personal feel to me, but that's another blog).

Once he's away from his domain, there's really nothing to go back to whatsoever. His trailer is locked because he hasn't paid rent, and he is forced to sleep in his van. He does have the aformentioned job, but lack of hours, lack of respect, and his drug addiction does not allow him to pay rent. He tries to make friends with a neighbor kid by playing an old Nintendo game with his likeness, but the kid looks incredibly bored and does it to appease him, and is obviously more interested in the now than the past. Randy seeks refuge at a local strip club, where he meets an aging stripper, played brilliantly by Marisa Tomei, trying to make her way also. The chemistry between the two is off the charts, and you really believe they are two lost souls trying to make it in a tough world. They start to hit it off, and she convinces him to contact the daughter that despises him.


In the mat world, Randy's health is starting to fail. It all culminates in a brutal hardcore match where he has a heart attack when it's all over. The scene is especially rough because you see that there is absolutely no one to visit him when he is near death, not even the wrestlers that found him in the locker room. This shows the loneliness of his life, and the feeling that his whole being is used for others' entertainment, and there's no one that truly cares for him. After his heart attack, Randy decides to take Cassidy's advice(the stripper) and goes to visit his daughter(played by Evan Rachel Wood, who is a tremendous actress). Problem is, she wants nothing to do with him, and is very skeptical of him.

Randy decides to retire from the ring and have a "normal life". He works part time at the grocery store, this time with customers, and decides to try to have a relationship with his daughter, who is still skeptical. He screws things up, once again, when he goes on a drug binge one night, and passes out, missing his dinner date with his daughter. She wants nothing to do with him ever again, and it puts him in a deep depression. He decides that the same fans and wrestlers that have used him all those years are his only family, and decides to wrestle, despite his health problems.

This movie is absolutely brilliant. It brings out a character who is perpetually naive about everything around him, and everyone around him. He is incredibly torn with the idea that the same people always using him could be the only ones that care. You do feel like he's laid back and cool to deal with, but you also feel sorry for him in every way whatsoever. I know the subject of wrestling is taboo for people, but this sucker deserved to do more than break even at the box office. One of the most brilliant movies I have ever seen.
Add CommentsAdd Comments
87
Vote
   


Where have you gone, Sanford Meisner?

Right now, as we speak, I am watching an 8 hour instructional DVD on Sanford Meisner's teachings. The class was in 1980, and at the time, the producers wanted to record Meisner's teachings before he shuffled off this mortal coil. Considering he'd lost his voice three times because of his smoking habits, and that his body had been through the plague of the damned the past few years or so, it was a good idea to play with.

Who knew Sandy would live another 17 years? Don't think there's even a compulsive gambler out there that would take that bet.

The premise was simple. One dark stage, one aging legendary acting coach, and twelve selected students for a dream program for any actor(at least in my mind). Lots of listening exercises(essential in acting), lots of role play. Dialogue is learned by rote(completely mechanical, so as you don't focus on the dialogue more than the scene itself). Very simple to understand, yet very hard to master. Meisner says it takes twenty years to truly become an actor, and I don't doubt that one ounce.

That being said, that brings me to the question above.

Where have you gone, Sanford Meisner?

I say this because you saw a complete level of commitment with each and every actor in his class. Everyone took notes, everyone listened intently, and everyone took his word as gospel. Mind you, you won't recognize a lot of his students in star power(Around that time, the most recognizable one I saw was Frances Sternhagen, who is best remembered as Ma Clavin on Cheers), but you could see how good they were.

Yes, I know that times have changed, and you can fart in JUST the right direction on youtube and become a celebrity. Good for them, and I'm not one to knock that because I'm looking for my break too. But should that be a copout excuse for being lackadaisical?

It's not all, and I'm probably generalizing a little too much here, but it's becoming a lot more common. There's PERFORMING and there's ACTING. In high school and, for the most part, college, you PERFORM. Most acting teachers at that level wouldn't know Meisner's teachings from a hole in the wall, and their idea of instruction is "STAND OVER THERE", and "READ YOUR LINES LIKE THIS!"(Huge pet peeve of mine at ANY level. DON'T DO THE ACTOR'S JOB FOR THEM!). This is purely the reason why the performers(won't call them actors yet) get killed when they hit New York or L.A.(with exceptions). They go into auditions with all the confidence in the world. Their local paper or their school paper gave great reviews of their performance, and they were ready to hit it big. Then 14 seconds later, they are stopped cold at their first audition because it just plain sucks. They were performing, and most theatre directors won't give them the time of day till they improve. Soon enough, the same thing happens over and over again, and they end up crushed and go back home. People say it's rough competition, and it is, but in those cases, it's improper preparation.

You should not be able to get away with performing in the mega markets, but if you watch television shows, it's obvious that expectations are getting lower. Not on the stars, mind you.....they've earned their spot, and for good reason. The expectations are getting lowered on the day players, and it shows in their performance. Let me explain.

Legendary actor Tony Randall once told a story about the Russian art house theatre when they came to America. Before they came, Americans knew a cruder version of theatre, one that hadn't changed with the times, and one filled with performance over beautiful acting. The Russians show up and display a level of acting never seen before. Most of all, the most MINUTE parts were played brilliantly. We're talking one scene, a couple of lines. Still played brilliantly.

That's called dedication and commitment.

So when you notice the tiniest roles on television now, it's obvious that most actors are treating it like "YAY, I'M ON TV! IT'S A CREDIT!", instead of making things look good. Yes, it's one thing if you have "More Pie, Ma'am" as your only line of dialogue. Can't do much there. It's another when you have one scene and have the same mindset. I told a buddy of mine once, who always told me that he'd do better at work if he made more money, that you should always have a psychology of kicking ass no matter the job. If you don't have the psychology of kicking ass in the crappiest of jobs, the tiniest of situations, or the smallest of roles.....it's pretty much guaranteed you won't have the kick ass psychology when things get better. Just because your paycheck got fatter, or responsibilities got better, doesn't mean excuse making goes away.

As I said, this could be a bit generalized because not everyone is like that, and I admit it, but it is more evident. If you watch guys like William Hung get 15 minutes of fame for sounding like a dying cat getting dragged down the interstate, then you too can light a firecracker up your ass and become famous. With that ease ends the higher expectations and the commitment, and that's too bad.

Because one thing is for certain. You watch the mega-stars on TV or film these days, the one difference between them and "More Pie, Ma'am" actress is, besides a little bit of luck and a break they needed?

Simply hard work and preparation. They want it more than anyone else.

I always tell people to live as if they were ten years old. You never hear ten year olds wanting to be fast food restaurant managers. They want to be doctors, lawyers, surgeons, actors, ballplayers, etc..... Some get to follow their dreams, and some marry early, get fat after four kids, and hope they can retire in this economy. Everyone has different ways to live life.

At 10 years old, everything's a dream. At 20 years old, it's a sacrifice.

How much are you willing to sacrifice.

How bad do you truly want it?
Add CommentsAdd Comments
32
Vote
   


The SAG debate: Yes or no on contract

I admit it, I'm not a SAG actor right now. In all honesty, I only have one extras credit in a SAG film, which was "We Are Marshall"(I'll blog about that another time), so I do not have a dog in this fight.

But I can still do two things.

1. Relay the facts.

2. Give my viewpoint.

Ok, here is THE main issue of the contract

New Media - Folks, this isn't 1972 anymore. Hell, it's not even 1999 anymore. New media, once again, is taking over the landscape at breakneck speed. I say "once again" because "new media" has been an issue for decades. Hollywood half feared and half scoffed at television in its inception. The movie studios thought it could hurt box office receipts, and some actors thought of it as a fad. Neither side saw the immense potential of a "radio with moving pictures", and neither side could see how far it would go. Go forward a few decades to the invention of the VCR(VHS and Beta, which is another blog for another day), and the television industry being scared to death that advertising would go down drastically if you could just record your shows. Another couple decades pass, and it's VCR to DVD, the DVD to HD, and so on.

Now it's another level of new media, which would be the Youtubes, and Hulus of the world. In the current contract, actors do not get residuals for showings through new media. So when millions of the American viewing public type in hulu.com to watch the episode of Heroes that they missed the night before, everyone involved in the making of the program misses out on serious lettuce.

Now, in this new contract, residuals will now get paid for new media......with a few twists. In the words of Martin Sheen.

A. The possibility of internet or made for new media TV shows non union.

B. Actors that appeared in pre 1974 TV shows or pre 1971 movies will never be compensated for ad sponsored internet or new media exhibition.

C. An actor in a scripted TV show, while in character, can be forced to endorse a product, despite personal or professional conflict.

For "Membership First's" view of the contract, go here.... Really Long Link

Look at the ages of the Membership first people voting NO on this contract.

Martin Sheen - 68
Elliott Gould - 70
Renee Taylor - 76
Clancy Brown - 50
Nichelle Nichols - 76
John Heard - 64

Let's be real(and that's not saying that it's ALL old actors against this contract, or all young ones for it), with the exception of guys like Martin Sheen and Elliott Gould, who could get work even if they suddenly became Helen Keller overnight(legends can do that), most of the old lions NEED the residuals in between sporadic work. You don't see these actors very much anymore, and there are some that truly need these residuals to survive. Not all of them, but some of them, are not financially stable. That's the facts of life in all of entertainment, whether sports or theatre or movies. Hell, there was a study that said 60% of NBA ballplayers go broke within 5 years of leaving the league. It happens.

Now watch the ones that ARE for the contract.

Really Long Link

Adam Arkin - 52
Amy Brennaman - 44
Stephen Collins - 61
Kate Walsh - 41
Ken Howard - 65
Jack Coleman - 51

It's probably like finding a needle in a haystack trying to locate one of THOSE actors who have huge credits pre 1974 or 1971. Stephen Collins and Ken Howard are the closest, and Ken Howard's big break came in 1978.

Pure and simple, it's preservation vs working now. I DO completely understand the older actors who take it personal that anything pre 1974 or 1971 will not get residuals. I do understand there is money lost there. I'm not bashing older actors at all. In fact, we all get old. It's just how we handle getting old, that's all.

But even with the respect I have for older actors, I'm with the younger ones here. This is NOT the economy to play around with right now. In the great depression, the movie industry was a complete gold mine. Pretty much the old industry making any money for the better part of a decade. The reason for this was simple....in hard times, people want to escape. It's no different now, even if the times aren't as tough as they were back then.

Why would you want to blow up a gold mine to go on strike? Why would you listen to such a fleabag like Alan Rosenberg, who has no one's interest but his own in the first place? Residuals are higher, health care benefits are better, and for the people that are set to join SAG in the coming year(I'm one of them), we are all set for something big if we want it bad enough.

So, even though I can't vote, I'm supporting the YES vote.

LET'S GET BACK TO WORK!!!!
Add CommentsAdd Comments
13
Vote
   


A letter to future readers

Hey folks,

My name's Jake McClain and I'm an actor here in Atlanta, GA. Many people have asked me why I'm here in a smaller market instead of L.A. or New York. Well, that's a very long story, and it'll be told at different times, through stories of my insane journey through an even more insane business.

But most of all, I'm going to make this an all-encompassing blog. I'll review everything from the $200 million blockbuster films, to the tiny films with a $17 budget with a broom handle being used as a boom mic, and a cereal box as a wind screen. I'll keep up with other up and coming actors around the country, and also deal with the other end of the camera.

The main thing, though, is that it's also going to be an opinion page also. Everyone that knows me knows that I'm boldly honest, highly opinionated, acerbic, and half insane. My whole life has been 50/50, and black and white. You either love me or hate me, and there's no gray area. I've embraced this because all I do is embrace honesty, and if you don't like me, just express it. I know who I am, and what I do.

So enjoy the ride.

Jake McClain
Add CommentsAdd Comments
22
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
153 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Samira's Blogs

1317 Vote(s)
4 Comment(s)
22 Post(s)
Moderated by Samira
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]